Skip to main content

How to Deal with Boring Meetings

image: https://pixabay.com/photos/girl-time-time-pressure-worried-2786277/


When was the last time that you bailed-out of a boring meeting?

In-person meetings are tougher to bail-out on because everyone in the room will watch you leave. They'll be looking for a reason. They'll be criticizing your commitment.

In a virtual meeting, it's easier. Especially if there are dozens of people in the meeting. You wouldn't think twice about leaving a meeting of a hundred people that turned out to be a droning infomercial for someone's product or service.

I don't like the choice to bail-out, but it's not the worst choice. It's just a choice. 

Finding myself in a boring meeting I gave it some thought and drew this chart. These aren't the only choices for reacting to a boring meeting, but they do give us a range of options.

Influence

Escape

Partical Escape

Disrupt

image: doug smith

Influence

My first choice is to influence the meeting. Make it better. Help it get back on track. Even when we aren't in charge or leading the meeting we can influence the process and then the outcomes. One of my former associates, Ed Anzalone, called this "leading from the back of the room." The whole purpose is to help facilitate success, not to take over.

Things we can do to influence a meeting include:

  • Asking questions to clarify and explore
  • Offering helpful suggestions, especially around process
  • Exploring the thoughts and feelings of others in the room
  • Stepping in to intervene when someone is hopelessly struggling
We can't always influence the meeting, though. Influencing is a great choice when:
  • The group is small (fewer than twenty people)
  • You already enjoy rapport and some form of relationship with the people in the meeting
  • The stakes are high and you can't afford a bad meeting and cannot leave

Escape

Another choice is to simply leave the meeting, to escape. Let's face it, there are some meetings where we neither provide or gain any value. To stay means to waste our time. Who wants to do that?

We shouldn't jump to the escape choice, but it might make sense if:

  • The group is large (more than twenty people)
  • Your attendance has been offered as optional
  • The stakes are very low
  • You have something much higher priority that you should be doing

Partial Escape

In virtual meetings, and maybe even in face-to-face meetings, this is the most common tactic that people pull. If you're leading the meeting it is no fun to watch. If you're stuck in a deadly boring meeting though it might be unavoidable.

Partial escape is staying in the meeting but multi-tasking. While others drone on, you remain but tune them out enough to tune something else in. Typically, people will email, prepare for other tasks, and even scroll through social medial. It's rude but common.

Be careful about selecting this choice unless:

  • You are not really needed in the meeting
  • The outcome of the meeting is already certain
  • You can multi-task and escape detection
On a positive note, if you are multi-tasking by doodling instead of scrolling -- by drawing pictures and charts to amuse yourself, you might actually retain more about the meeting than someone who simply listens.

Disrupt

Truly the last choice for reacting to a boring meeting is to disrupt it. I don't recommend that you do this, but it is worth being prepared for when others do. Here's what you might observe when someone is intentionally disrupting a meeting:

  • Complaining
  • Creating drama
  • Conflict
Most people have a story, maybe many stories, about disrupted meetings. Some have even broken out into fights. Many have occurred in what were once serene school board and local government meetings. Decorum is lost, manners disappear, tempers flair.

A skillful facilitator can get the meeting back on track, but if the meeting is already out of control, here are some suggestions:

  • Take a break -- maybe people are tired
  • Hydrate -- maybe people are thirsty
  • Eat something -- your body is a built-in chemistry set and if the chemicals are wack, watch out
  • Stand up -- sure, this gets attention sometimes but that could be a good thing when you want to level up to influencing the meeting and it's also a great way to release your own tension.

What to do?

That is always completely up to you. As always, pro-active beats reactive so if you can influence the meeting BEFORE it begins that will position you well to influence when necessary, which is the high performance pick.

Sometimes you can even un-invite yourself if you can tell that the meeting is low on your list of desirable priorities. 

And whatever you choose, I'd advocate for maintaining respect. No one wants a jerk in a meeting.

-- doug smith


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Better Feedback

The trouble with feedback is that we don't want it, or if we do we don't know how to give it, and don't know when to start or stop it. Ah, but what if we did? What if we could build a high-feedback culture where people were open to feedback and knew how to put it to immediate use? We can. It takes practice. It takes experience. It takes caring about how we do feedback and who we share it with. Here's one thing you can change immediately that will dramatically improve the feedback frequency on your team: ask for advice more often...and then really listen. Don't even call it feedback. Ask for advice and not only will everyone have some, once you show that you're open to it, they'll ask for advice in return.  What's your best tip on giving and receiving feedback? -- doug smith  

Avoid the Trap

It's easy to fall into it. A juicy bit of information about someone you know hits the air. Do you comment? Do you defend? Do you ignore the situation? Gossip is a trap that tricks our tongues into poisoning ourselves. Honor the absent, don't talk about them. If you wouldn't say it TO them, keep it to yourself.  Gossip is a trap; don't fall in. -- doug smith  

Success Is Learned

Success is learned, as well as achieved. We learn by striving, studying, practicing, planning, performing -- all the many ways to learn in order to approve.  Each successful goal achieved teaches us more about success. What works best for us, what gets other people involved,  what we'd best plan and what we need to improvise. Turn by turn, goal by goal, we learn how to do better. What have you learned today about achieving your goals? -- doug smith

Think It Through and Ask About it, too

The best leaders solve more problems than they cause. That may be more obvious than common. I've kept a journal for most of my life. In that series of journals are accounts of decisions made by leaders often without consulting the constituents they involve, usually with a sense of urgency that distorts all common sense. Lives disrupted, business interrupted, customers stranded -- all in the name of profit and expediency. Of course profit is necessary. Naturally, we share a sense of urgency to get things done before everything changes. But it is ever so easy to cause more problems than we solve if we don't stop to think them thru. Do the proper analysis. Create mutually beneficial solutions. Engage everyone involved.  I never met a leader who wanted to be remembered as terrible, but I sure have met plenty who are. -- doug smith

What's Possible

  Problems that seem unsolvable at the micro-level may be manageable at their macro-level. Check your perspective. Gauge your distance. Focus on what is possible.  Ask the questions you'd ask about any mystery. What's going on? How did we get here? Where do we want to go? What other questions do you ask in order to move from impossible to possible? -- doug smith

Reasonable

Leaders love stretch goals. It does make sense to help our team members grow, through ambitious projects and next-level assignments.  But if you've ever had a leader take that too far you know it doesn't motivate anyone to frustrate them. It's not empowering to crush under an impossible task. Set reasonable expectations or face disappointment. Whether it's with someone else, or even yourself. Isn't an outrageous promise a kind of lie? Let's do what we can do, and be careful about promising the unreasonable. -- doug smith  

Show Me The Data

Some leaders like to say that they rely on their gut instincts. "I'll just know when it's right," they'll say. Experience can tell us that we know what we're doing because of how we feel. How we feel, though, might not be our best guide. If gut instincts are right, they are right about remembering a similar circumstance and what you decided. It's worth asking "is this circumstance really the same?" and "how sure am I about this?" and most importantly, "am I really listening to intuition or is it something else -- like a hidden bias?" One company I've worked with had a phrase to rely on: "show me the data." What do the facts say? What are we missing? Is the information we are relying on reliable? Does it say what we think it says? Unless you are deciding what to eat, you probably should not rely on your gut. Find the facts. Test your instincts. Interrogate your assumptions. If it's important why not be sure? -...

Consensus on Change

Which is harder to accomplish, change, or consensus on the change? With most people agreeing and supporting a change, the change would certainly be easier. But is it really easier to achieve that consensus? Isn't it faster to just impose the change whether people like it or not? No. Consensus for change is tougher to achieve than change. If you take the time and make the effort to achieve that consensus, the chances are that you are making a better, more resilient change. There's no need to manipulate people who see the value of the change. -- d oug smith  

Decisions and Solutions

  The decisions you make during problem solving are as important as the solutions you develop, even if they do not lead to solutions. Decisions around relationships, around results, around permanence and transition.  Do you want everyone to be better off because of the resolution of the problem, or do you just want a quick fix? Do you value how people respond to your efforts? Do you really know more about the impact and urgency of the situation than the people who will be most affected by your solutions? Decide carefully. You know that, and I know that, but sometimes we do forget, don't we? -- doug smith

Are We Perfect Yet?

I've said it often and it is still true: there are no perfect people, there are no perfect processes, and there are no perfect products. Nothing in this life is perfect. In a way, isn't that perfect? It means that it is completely up to us to make things better. It is within our need to improve processes, to develop people, to create new products. If we don't do it, who will? That means we might need to overcome our ego's need to feel perfect by examining exactly where we stand. How are we doing? What does the feedback say? Where are we on this road of improvement? Critical thinking requires some self-evaluation. Not to hurt our feelings, but to develop our capacity. Are we perfect yet? Of course not, but it's ever so much fun to be on the road headed in that direction. -- doug smith